- 2/10/2012 Liberty Tax told 'no ballyhooing; wavers' pulled off the street in NA'
- 2/5/2012 ASU offers bridge program for black males
- 2/5/2012 Hall to honor Bush, Twiggs
- 2/5/2012 Aiken Chamber names Star, Standard publisher Man of Year
- 2/5/2012 Star Profile: Deloris Bodie
- 2/5/2012 Banquet to be held to 'stop senior hunger'
- 2/5/2012 Star birthdays for Feb. 2-8
- 2/5/2012 It's time to think about taxes
- 2/5/2012 Darrel Chaney to speak at baseball reunion banquet
- 2/5/2012 Patriots, Jackets split season finale
- 2/5/2012 Jackets lose home pair to Wildcats
- 2/5/2012 FCHS girls hold onto playoff hopes
- 1/30/2012 Lynn leads team to flag football title
- 1/30/2012 Hall of Fame announces 2011 class
- 1/30/2012 Belvedere Girls Softball sign-ups in February
- 1/30/2012 Both Jacket squads stumble vs. Bruins
- 2/5/2012 Editorial: Another fallen hero
- 2/5/2012 Dolphin days
- 2/5/2012 Patriot's pride
- 2/5/2012 Patriot reflections
- 2/5/2012 News from the front porch
- 2/5/2012 Through my eyes: A legend is remembered as Joe Paterno is laid to rest
- 2/5/2012 A new year for the General Assembly
- 2/5/2012 Wrinkles
- 2/5/2012 Phragments from Phyllis: Savoring all those Kodachrome moments
- 2/5/2012 The Creek speaks
School Board suggests bonds for upgrades
As the Aiken County School Board prepares to take a systematic look at its school facilities, the district administration suggests that the economic climate is favorable for a bond issue for new construction and renovations.
Any issue of general obligation bonds would require approval of Aiken County voters in a public referendum.
A facility report received by the School Board in March 2008 identified about $350 million in facility needs in the district and recommended a first-phase project for about $150 million.
In a memo to the School Board, district administrators said a bond referendum for that amount might require a millage increase of only two to three mills. For owner-occupied homes, taxpayers would see their tax bill go up $8 to $12 per $100,000 of value. For a second residence, the tax increase would be $12 to $18 per $100,000 of value.
With the district dealing with ongoing state budget cuts in the past 16 months, the School Board has had limited discussions about facilities since then.
At a meeting Tuesday, the Board approved a timeline for a formal process, including a study session on the Kahn report Tuesday, Oct. 27, at 6:15 p.m., before the regular board meeting at 7 p.m.
"It's an opportunity now to bring this to the forefront," said Board Chair Dr. Christine Harkins following Tuesday's meeting. "We are aware that we have facility needs in our district and scarce dollars. We will need additional money at some point for new facilities, repairs and major maintenance, but the dollars are getting less and less."
Bond rates are down substantially, Harkins said, and supplies and construction materials would be available at lower cost.
"We have construction companies desperate to find work," she said. "For us, the field is fertile."
In the memo, district officials outlined reasons for "why now?" with regard to the prospect of substantial expenditures on facility needs.
* The needs are not going away and will become more profound over time.
* The "five-year" building plan approach the district has used for nearly three decades has worked well in the past. That process generates $5 million to $7 million a year for new construction or major renovations. With construction costs rising in recent years, a new elementary school would take at least three budget years to finance.
Still, construction costs are falling at the moment and "this creates an optimum opportunity for considering the implementation of a comprehensive program," the memorandum stated.
The proposed planning process would include staff and public input on facility needs, programmatic facility needs, prioritization of needs and the financial issues involved. A timeline proposed by the administration calls for Board action in December but left the door open for the process to continue through May 2010 if the Board needs additional time.
During public participation at Tuesday's meeting, Public Education Partners Board Chairman Tim O'Briant said the education foundation is offering its active support for a bond referendum for school facilities.
"It's been 33 years since the Board asked voters to support a referendum," O'Briant said. "The Board funded 12 new schools since then with no referendums, and that is excellent stewardship. But 46 percent of students still attend schools built before 1960."
No high school student attends a school designed for today's technology. The Public Education Partners board believes the lack of updated facilities hurts Aiken County and its economic development growth, O'Briant said.
"Because of the current bond market, this is a historic opportunity," he said. "This is a half-price sale, where you can get a lot for less."
Contact Rob Novit at rnovit@aikenstandard.com.








Notice about comments:
AikenStandard.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. AikenStandard.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not AikenStandard.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.