- 2/10/2012 Liberty Tax told 'no ballyhooing; wavers' pulled off the street in NA'
- 2/5/2012 ASU offers bridge program for black males
- 2/5/2012 Hall to honor Bush, Twiggs
- 2/5/2012 Aiken Chamber names Star, Standard publisher Man of Year
- 2/5/2012 Star Profile: Deloris Bodie
- 2/5/2012 Banquet to be held to 'stop senior hunger'
- 2/5/2012 Star birthdays for Feb. 2-8
- 2/5/2012 It's time to think about taxes
- 2/5/2012 Darrel Chaney to speak at baseball reunion banquet
- 2/5/2012 Patriots, Jackets split season finale
- 2/5/2012 Jackets lose home pair to Wildcats
- 2/5/2012 FCHS girls hold onto playoff hopes
- 1/30/2012 Lynn leads team to flag football title
- 1/30/2012 Hall of Fame announces 2011 class
- 1/30/2012 Belvedere Girls Softball sign-ups in February
- 1/30/2012 Both Jacket squads stumble vs. Bruins
- 2/5/2012 Editorial: Another fallen hero
- 2/5/2012 Dolphin days
- 2/5/2012 Patriot's pride
- 2/5/2012 Patriot reflections
- 2/5/2012 News from the front porch
- 2/5/2012 Through my eyes: A legend is remembered as Joe Paterno is laid to rest
- 2/5/2012 A new year for the General Assembly
- 2/5/2012 Wrinkles
- 2/5/2012 Phragments from Phyllis: Savoring all those Kodachrome moments
- 2/5/2012 The Creek speaks
Aiken County Council hears plans on Complex addition
Aiken County Council now must narrow even further the field of architectural firms which submitted proposals on the expansion and modification of the current County Complex after hearing presentations from the top six earlier this week.
The firms selected as the top six contenders based on the caliber of their proposals individually met with Council Monday and Tuesday in closed executive session and presented their conceptual plans.
Council members report a particular firm has not yet been identified as the favorite, partly because there are more questions to be answered.
County Administrator Clay Killian said he will be contacting several firms in the next few days to gather additional information, including cost estimates, to be presented to Council at its Jan. 19 meeting. Council is then expected to further discuss the issue in executive session.
The top six firms have not been identified.
Councilman Sandy Haskell called each presentation "outstanding."
"I don't think any of the six would do a bad job. With the current economic situation being what it is, now is the time to move forward. Prices have leveled out and sometimes even declined from where they peaked three to four years ago. We want the best building economically, the best building that serves the community and one that is aesthetically pleasing," he said.
The firms were asked to submit plans on the design and construction of 120,000 extra square feet on the site, coupled with the building's existing 66,000 square feet. Each proposal indicated the work could be done at the existing site on Richland Avenue.
Council Chairman Ronnie Young anticipates that, once Council narrows the field even further, the remaining firms will be asked to come back and the scope of their conceptual proposals refined by parameters set forth by Council. Then, at least one or two firms will be asked to submit contract proposals.
Once the final firm is chosen, the public will be encouraged to provide its input because "this is their building," Young said.
"Council was very pleased with the presentations. I just hope we can get this process moving," he said.
Killian believes Council could select a firm in February. The design process will take another eight months to one year.








Notice about comments:
AikenStandard.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. AikenStandard.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not AikenStandard.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.