Windsor vs. S.C. Treasurer
It makes sense that the State of South Carolina would want its cities' and towns' finances to be scrutinized. There have been too many news stories over the years of people in responsible positions within municipal governments who have mismanaged or outright taken money.
Municipalities are required to send an audit of their finances each year to the office of the Treasurer of South Carolina. In many cases that seems appropriate, but there must be some sense of equity when it comes to small towns. The town of Windsor right here in Aiken County is a prime example.
Windsor was among those towns listed by Treasurer Converse Chellis as not having supplied an audit for 2008 as required by law. Town Mayor Frank Mizell says the town, with a meager budget, would go bankrupt if it has to get a complete audit to submit.
With only 100 residents, Windsor uses its annual budget to keep the town clean, cut the grass and maintain street lights. A full-blown audit might cost the town $5,000. Windsor stands to lose $792 in state funds if it does not comply submit the audit.
The Treasurer's office needs to bend the requirements to keep towns such as Windsor from facing the choice of being out of compliance or spending an exorbitant part of its budget on an annual audit.
1:58 AM: SRNS donates $20K to support PEP
12:32 AM: Missing woman's burned SUV found near Charleston
12:32 AM: DHEC doesn't know about S.C. medical waste shipment
12:32 AM: Police: GPS device linked man to Loris shooting
12:32 AM: Ex-SLED chief is among those defending video gaming devices
12:32 AM: S.C., N.C. almost finished with work on new border
- Local events for Friday, Feb. 10
- USCA women get revenge at home
- State approves $13.5M for road work in city
- Pacer hoops squads look to erase bad memories
- LETTER: Create jobs instead of slamming unions
- Could the USC-Clemson rivalry game ever go away?
- OPINION: Statehouse tackles 'honest-to-goodness red-blooded battle'
- South Carolina baseball program reaching new heights
- SC AG sues over rejected voter ID law
- New equipment allows larger planes to land at Aiken airport






Notice about comments:
AikenStandard.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. AikenStandard.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not AikenStandard.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.