Evidence in mobile meth lab case might be inadmissible
The contents of a car that police said was a mobile methamphetamine lab they found driving through downtown Aiken might not make it to trial.
In November 2008, John R. Johnson, then 27, and Denise Williams, then 37, both of the Augusta area, were stopped by officer Demetrick Drumming for a traffic violation. After the stop, a drug dog was called to the scene and alerted on materials and chemicals used to manufacture methamphetamine.
However, the way that stop was handled, and the length of time the pair were detained before the lab was discovered, could be ruled illegal and that evidence thrown out.
When the car was stopped and the alleged lab discovered, it shut down the intersection of York Street and Hampton Avenue for several hours. The voluminous contents of the car, the accused pair and police officers all had to be decontaminated.
Crews in hazardous materials protective suits began to remove from the car the items, which included shirts, pants, shorts and other articles of clothing, a lamp, lamp shade, couch cushion, planter, shop vacuum and two mannequin heads.
In a hearing Wednesday, Johnson's attorney Bob Harte argued that officers detained Johnson for an unreasonable amount of time so they could wait on the drug dog, despite not having enough evidence to do so.
Drumming admitted that a normal traffic stop takes around 10 minutes; however, this stop took upward of half an hour.
The officer's reasoning for stopping Johnson, who is set for trial on a manufacturing methamphetamine charge, was the discovery of a prescription pill bottle that did not belong to either Johnson or Williams. It did, however, belong to a family friend and was legal. Drumming also said his suspicions were piqued because Johnson acted nervous and because of the car's condition.
Presiding Judge Doyet A. "Jack" Early took the information and will render a decision at a later date.
"You know I admire all the officers that come into this courtroom and you know how I preach against drugs in this courtroom ... and quite frankly this is a close question and I've got to make the call," he said.
The case seems to hinge on whether the State must prove there was reasonable evidence to delay the vehicle, or whether they needed a higher level of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Contact Mike Gellatly at mgellatly@aikenstandard.com.
- Local events for Friday, Feb. 10
- USCA women get revenge at home
- State approves $13.5M for road work in city
- Pacer hoops squads look to erase bad memories
- LETTER: Create jobs instead of slamming unions
- Could the USC-Clemson rivalry game ever go away?
- OPINION: Statehouse tackles 'honest-to-goodness red-blooded battle'
- South Carolina baseball program reaching new heights
- SC AG sues over rejected voter ID law
- New equipment allows larger planes to land at Aiken airport








Notice about comments:
AikenStandard.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. AikenStandard.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not AikenStandard.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.