COLUMN: Reject this plan for riverfront development

  • Posted: Thursday, January 24, 2013 5:57 p.m.

Project Jackson, North Augusta’s attempt to shoehorn a 225-bed hotel and a 5,000-seat stadium into the Hammond’s Ferry and River Club areas of North Augusta should be rejected on so many levels, it is hard to know where to start.

The people who live in the River Club are steadfastly opposed to the stadium, because it will bring unwanted traffic, parking, noise, light, litter, crime and other disruptions to an area known for its quiet, natural retreat-like area along the river.

In a recent survey of the River Club residents, 85 percent of them rejected building the stadium.

The residents who live in Hammond’s Ferry and the River Club will have to live with this eyesore and intrusion into their lives for the next 20 to 30 years, and it is contrary to the very plans the city signed on to in the 2009 Master Plan for Augusta/North Augusta, also known as the Westabou Vision see: augustatomorrow.org.

The mantra of city government is long range planning. The 2009 Master Plan is less than four years old, and is now ready for the trash bin. North Augustans should ask for a refund on the moneys spent to research and draft the plan.

The plan called for a hotel, yes, but on the hill across from the municipal building, not next to the river; and it didn’t call for blocking the view of the river with a huge stadium.

The city leaders put together another long range planning document called North August 2000 “The Vision Continues.”

It’s full of smiling faces and glowing testaments to North Augusta’s planned development – no one suggesting a 5,000 seat stadium should be squeezed in between the brick ponds and the Greeneway. Visit northaugusta2000.org for details.

Let’s also debunk the standard comeback lines you’ll hear:

• This will create jobs or improve the local economy. Studies show that lower Class A baseball teams like the Green Jackets have no positive economic impact on their communities. Even if you assume there is a positive impact, that impact is already here in the CSRA, and moving the team two miles from their current location will not magically improve or add to the local economy.

• You’ll hear the hotel needs an anchor so we will build a stadium. Class A baseball teams don’t draw overnight guests to their venues that’s not the anchor investors are looking for.

• Finally, you’ll hear the mayor say, “We built the brick ponds, it’s our Central Park, do you really think we would now destroy them?” or words to that effect. What the mayor doesn’t understand is, you can destroy the calm, restive, restorative area, like the brick ponds without disturbing one ounce of the water in them. The lights, noise, traffic, and litter created by the stadium will be a hostile neighbor for the flora and fauna and people who visit the park.

And one more thing, next time you are in New York City, go to Central Park, and let us know how many stadiums you see there.

The use of the Tax Increment Financing District to create this monstrosity also is not in keeping with the spirit if not the letter of South Carolina law, but that’s an issue that deserves a separate letter of its own.

Steve Donohue is the president of the River Club Homeowners Association.

Comments { }

Commenting rules: Do not post offensive, racial or violent messages. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the commenter, not www.aikenstandard.com. Click 'report abuse' for any comments that you feel should be removed from the site. However, www.aikenstandard.com is not obligated to remove any comment posted on the site. Moderators do not have the ability to edit comments. Read the terms of use.