Legislature overrides Gov.'s payday lending veto 6/17/2009 12:03 AM
By JIM DAVENPORT Associated Press
COLUMBIA -- The Legislature overrode Gov. Mark Sanford's veto of new regulations on the payday lending industry amid threats they'd come back later and get tougher or ban the business outright.
It was the best known of 10 bills Sanford vetoed after the Legislature wrapped up a recession-shortened session last month. Sanford didn't muster the one-third vote needed for any of his vetoes to stand.
Sanford's veto said that in the midst of recession that people needed access to borrowed money, that the payday lending industry should not be singled out for tougher scrutiny and the database the bill created would give rise to privacy concerns.
But legislators had spent two years working on bills to limit loans and they easily disposed of Sanford's veto with a 105-4 vote in the House followed more than three hours later in the Senate with a 39-3 vote.
Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer said the override was disappointing. "If people need money, they are going to find a way to get it and there are more destructive ways of doing that," he said.
But consumer advocates were happy to be making progress on an issue they've pressed for years.
"It's been such a hard battle," said Teresa Arnold, an AARP lobbyist who helped push the regulations. While the legislation is a small step, it "takes us certainly farther than we are."
"They're going to be tough," said Jamie Fulmer, spokesman for Advance America Cash Centers Inc., the Spartanburg-based industry leader. "Some operators are not going to be able to continue operations."
While the House vote came with little debate, Sen. Kevin Bryant, a pharmacist and Anderson Republican, said the database was open for abuse. "There's always somebody out there that's willing to break the rules," Bryant warned.
The bulk of the legislation will go into effect when the database is ready to use. It will limit people to a single $550 loan at any time. Consumers would have to wait a day between loans for the first seven and then two days for additional loans.
Current law lets payday lenders charge $15 for every $100 borrowed on a two-week loan, the annual percentage rate equivalent of 460 percent. That law also caps loans at $300 each, but there's no limit on the number of consumers can take out, so many write two checks at a time and then take out more loans when they can't pay those off.
Sen. Gerald Malloy, D-Hartsville, said if the industry doesn't stop predatory practices, he'd make a mission out of cracking down it. "If you provide a necessary service, good for you," Malloy said. But "the message we are getting from our community is it is not."
Sue Berkowitz, executive director of the low-income advocacy group South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center, said legislators and consumer advocates will be able to measure what the industry does with that database. They'll be watching to see if consumers are locked in a cycle of debt from back-to-back loans.
"The industry claims people don't make loan after loan and take out money that they can't afford to pay back," Berkowitz said. "The Legislature is willing to give them an opportunity to try to behave honorably."
Fulmer said those repeat loans show "a small number of consumers that don't use the product responsibly."
Legislators are skeptical.
"I do think ultimately we are going to be looking at banning the industry in this state," Sen. John Courson, R-Columbia, said.
Sanford also lost a bit of his executive authority. The Legislature overrode his veto of a bill that takes away his power to fire board members at will from the State Ports Authority Board. Legislators talk about restructuring, but "what we saw today is despite their talk about accountability, our state is saddled with a legislative body that is content to further set our state back as has been done with this bill," Sanford in a statement.
Sanford can still remove board members for cause and appoint two new members to the board every year as terms expire, said Senate Transportation Committee Chairman Larry Grooms, R-Bonneau.
Notice about comments:
AikenStandard.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. AikenStandard.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not AikenStandard.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Comment Title: waitng periods
Waiting periods are bad news for consumers, All because of the people that get too many of these loans...then the "consumer advocates" try to claim that this is status quo and make it tougher on the people that they claim to be trying to protect. What a joke...Database should help sort this mess out hopefully. Then the "advocates"try to misrepresent the fees as a high intrest rate when it is only 15 percent for the duration of the loan is another joke. These loans are only for two weeks in most cases. Should let people make their own decisions.....oh I'm sorry I guess us dumb South Carolinians are too stupid to make our own decisions...we need "advocates".
Posted by: On: 6/17/2009
Comment Title:
The "stupid" lawmakers in Columbia think that you can outlaw or limit "stupid". I guess it takes one to know one right?
Posted by: On: 6/17/2009
Comment Title:
Why is government regulating against the stupidity of some citizens? These patrons understand the terms and interest rates they are paying. You can't fix stupid.
3