NNSA admin is 'very happy' with MOX 11/4/2009 7:40 PM
By MIKE GELLATLY Staff writer
The National Nuclear Safety Administration is "very happy" with the progress being made at the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility despite the facility again being cited and not having a customer for the multi-billion dollar product.
Thomas P. D'Agostino, NNSA administrator, was in Aiken on Wednesday to tour the facility and the other missions at Savannah River Site one day after a recent inspection report cited four specific faults with the MOX project's construction.
"These are incredibly minor issues ... very minor. They do not affect the integrity of construction at all," D'Agostino said. "There is strong support (for the project); in fact, the (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) was strongly supportive."
In a report made public Tuesday, four violations were noted from the most recent round of inspections.
From July 1 to Sept. 30, on-site and regional inspectors conducted a review of the facility's progress. The violations were all graded as severity level IV, the lowest level of infraction, and deal with technical specification modifications and red tape issues.
"It's all about getting the paperwork perfectly right," D'Agostino said. "The paperwork has to be correct, and we appreciate the NRC's look at this. The whole point is that this is a very complicated facility, a multi-billion dollar facility, many hundreds of workers. Rebar and concrete coming together in a very complicated way. It is not unusual to have some minor violations."
Beyond the negatives of being cited, the administrator thinks this report shows that the inspection system in place is doing its job.
"A violation sounds bad, but in reality that proves that the system is working," he said. "If we had many higher levels of NRC violations, that would be a concern. Level IV violations, frankly, are not unusual. We don't want to have that as a matter of course, but the reality is that these are fairly innocuous and they do not affect at all the safety, the integrity of the plant, and things are coming together quite nicely and we are very happy with that."
This was not MOX's first violation. Last year, an audit by the Department of Energy's inspector general found that both time and money had been wasted when construction materials were bought and installed that did not meet technical specifications. The report said that if it had gone undetected, the substandard materials could have, in a worst-case scenario, caused injury to workers or the public. When the study was released, it stated that "the MOX facility had incurred costs of more than $680,000 due to problems associated with the procurement of $11 million of nonconforming safety-class reinforcing steel."
On Wednesday, D'Agostino was upbeat about potential MOX customers when the project's complete. The project came under public scrutiny when Duke Energy backed out of a contract it had to buy the fuel.
However, the administrator said Duke is still one of several energy providers interested in the product.
"We have strong interest from multiple sources to buy the fuel," he said.
Construction of the facility is set to run into 2014 followed by a cold startup with inert materials. After extensive testing, production work should begin in 2016.
When operational, MOX will be capable of turning 3.5 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium into MOX fuel assemblies annually. The facility will be licensed for 20 years, with operations expected to continue into the 2020s, according to Shaw Areva MOX Services.
Contact Mike Gellatly at mgellatly@aikenstandard.com.
Notice about comments:
AikenStandard.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. AikenStandard.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not AikenStandard.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Posted by: On: Thursday, November 12, 2009 2:38 PM
Comment Title: Response to Fiscal Conservative:
Looks like Fiscal Conservative is the only special interest. This project has widespread bipartisan support.
Report Abuse
Posted by: Fiscal Conservative On: Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:06 AM
Comment Title: MOX Frown
Check this link out - with no NRC license to use MOX & a long period to get a license will make 'em frown. The MOX plant has no customers & even if it did they have no license to use MOX. They put the MOX production cart before the MOX license & picked our pockets with a flawed program. Opppss$$$! http://www.foe.org/duke-energy-abandons-plutonium-fuel-mox-testing-program-south-carolina-reactor
Report Abuse
Posted by: On: Thursday, November 05, 2009 12:02 PM
Comment Title: Fiscal Conservative what so you propose?
Would you rather we bury the weapon grade plutonium in your back yard or let it be stolen by some rouge country or do you think we need to started another stupid war. Typical of conservastives wanting to complain but no solution. We all will benefit from this project and the world will be safer. Many more people would be out of work if it weren't for this project. I am very blessed to be working thanks to this great peace tiem project
Report Abuse
Posted by: On: Thursday, November 05, 2009 10:14 AM
Comment Title:
Mike, try this... When writing a positive piece on MOX, try being positive. It never fails that you always criticize MOX or bring up past incidents that are taken care of. Don't worry, I'll be here to criticize you every time you slip up or state an innaccuracy as fact. I believe in this project and you aren't the only voice in this village able to give an opinion.
Report Abuse
Posted by: On: Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:37 AM
Comment Title: Just wait
When the supply of cheap HEU the TAXPAYER has been buying from the former Soviet Union runs out in a couple of years and the price of uranium triples, MOX fuel will be a bargain, and buyers for the stuff will line up. This is one of the few investments I've ever seen the government make that actually makes sense! Why bury this stuff in a hole?
Report Abuse
Posted by: On: Thursday, November 05, 2009 7:34 AM
Comment Title: What?
Fiscal Conservative, what is your problem? It takes money to save money. The MOX facility will recycle fuel that TAXPAYERS have already paid for in some fashion. This will be a much more cost-effective source of energy and has created 1500 jobs in our area. Nothing is bad about this project!
Report Abuse
Posted by: On: Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:45 AM
Comment Title: Way to go MOX!
Thanks for all the hard work while keeping our families safe! Keep it up!
Report Abuse
Posted by: Fiscal Conservative On: Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:13 AM
Comment Title: MOX Money Happy
I'd be happy too if I were a contractor raking in the cash in building the expensive MOX plant at SRS. The tax payer is swinging to the tune of special interests and the big-government backed contractors are laughing at that. If private interests want to pay for such SRS programs, let them, but this nuclear socialism is getting extreme.
Report Abuse
