Man on trial for soliciting a teen 6/17/2009 12:36 AM
By MICHAEL GELLATLY A Columbia man, whose trial began Tuesday, is facing up to 30 years in jail if convicted of charges related to an alleged attempt to solicit sex from a 14-year-old girl.
Benjamin Paul Green, 29, of Grey's Inn Road in Columbia, is facing charges of criminal solicitation of a minor and attempted criminal sexual conduct with a minor.
Green is alleged to have solicited a person he thought was an Aiken County teen for sex. However, when he showed up in Aiken for his date, he met the "girl" and two of her friends - three Aiken County Sheriff's Office investigators.
In the trial, the prosecution, headed by Suzanne Ringler of the Attorney General's Office, laid out its case against Green.
Investigator Tommy Platt was the main witness who testified Tuesday.
Platt conducted the online chat with Green. Testimony showed that a chatroom user named "Blackslider" approached "LittleMandy14SC" and began a very graphic conversation focused on "Mandy's" sexual experience.
"Blackslider" was Green, who continued the conversation after hearing the "girl" was only 14.
Platt testified that most users discontinue chats with undercover investigators once they learn a chatter is underage.
Unabated, Green sent three pictures. One of his face and two of his erect genitals.
The pair chatted and agreed to meet in Beech Island. Green picked up a bottle of liquor, condoms and a "supplement of a sexual nature."
When Green was confronted by officers, he admitted that he was there to meet a 14-year-old girl.
Green's defense attorney described the actions of the investigators as luring his client and questioned the fairness of the proactive investigation.
A proactive investigation is one where officers pose and wait to be approached by others, rather than a reactive investigation which starts after a crime is committed.
The defense attorney, Michael McMullen, also attacked perceived flaws in the prosecution's evidence. Archives of the chat between ACSO posing as Mandy and Green were missing the very first line of conversation.
And, the backup software which records the interactions was also out of order.
The trial is expected to conclude today with more members of law enforcement to testify.
Notice about comments:
AikenStandard.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. AikenStandard.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not AikenStandard.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Comment Title:
He was attempting to commit the crime and was stopped....just as someone may be attemting to rob a bank but is stopped before he actually has cash in his hand. Does that mean he wasn't robbing the bank? I don't think so. In most of the cases we gave seen recently involving this type of arrest the perp was talking to an under age person, and at some point a responsible adult intervened...thank goodness.
Posted by: On: 6/17/2009
Comment Title:
Not Defending this guy in any manner. But, how can you attempt to committee a crime of this type, when in reality the victim does not exist ? There was never any opportunity to committee the crime. No opportunity ? No crime .
2